{
  "absoluteUrl": "http://computan-2661279.hs-sites.com/test-blog/fractional-interest-minority-premium-really",
  "featuredImage": "",
  "featuredImageAltText": "",
  "featuredImageHeight": 0,
  "featuredImageWidth": 0,
  "id": 5634048444,
  "post_summary": "<p>I recently read a short description of a presentation made by an IRS Engineer Team Manager at the National IRS Symposium sponsored by the American Society of Appraisers (ASA). The presentation addressed the application of discounts to fractional interests, and asserted that certain levels of discounts amounted to a “minority premium” for certain non-controlling interests. The speaker presented a financial model that suggested certain caps on the discounts applicable to fractional interests. Much of the logic behind the model and the theory are valid in a world where one considers specific buyers. However, when applying Fair Market Value (FMV), the theory quickly disintegrates into an attempt to ignore the proper standard of value.</p> \n",
  "title": "Fractional Interest – “Minority Premium”?….Really?",
  "topicNames": [
    "Articles",
    "Valuation",
    "Hide Date"
  ]
}

{
  "absoluteUrl": "http://computan-2661279.hs-sites.com/test-blog/tax-law-evolution",
  "featuredImage": "",
  "featuredImageAltText": "",
  "featuredImageHeight": 0,
  "featuredImageWidth": 0,
  "id": 5633834443,
  "post_summary": "<p>The year started with a proverbial “BANG” from an estate planning perspective with the passage of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 late last year. The Act, as some have named TRUJCA, could almost just as easily been titled “Estate Tax Repeal.” Regardless of the name, the new rules certainly have people talking about the numerous planning opportunities it affords, although those may be temporary.</p> \n",
  "title": "Tax Law Evolution",
  "topicNames": [
    "Articles",
    "Valuation",
    "Hide Date"
  ]
}

Props

{
   "defaultContent": {
      "nextPage": "Next page",
      "previousPage": "Previous page"
   },
   "defaultRules": {
      "lockHeadingTextField": true
   },
   "dataQueryResult": {},
   "fieldValues": {
      "defaultContent": {
         "nextPage": "Next page",
         "previousPage": "Previous page"
      },
      "defaultRules": {
         "lockHeadingTextField": true
      }
   },
   "hublParameters": {
      "field_types": {
         "defaultContent": "group",
         "defaultRules": "group"
      },
      "is_widget_block": true,
      "module_id": 209876701002,
      "org_tag": "module_block",
      "parent_widget_container": "main",
      "path": "@projects/react-theme-huzaifa/theme/components/modules/BlogListing",
      "smart_type": "NOT_SMART",
      "widget_type": "module",
      "wrap_field_tag": "div"
   },
   "hublData": {
      "blogPostIds": [
         5634048444,
         5633834443
      ],
      "blogPosts": [
         {
            "absoluteUrl": "http://computan-2661279.hs-sites.com/test-blog/fractional-interest-minority-premium-really",
            "featuredImage": "",
            "featuredImageAltText": "",
            "featuredImageHeight": 0,
            "featuredImageWidth": 0,
            "id": 5634048444,
            "post_summary": "<p>I recently read a short description of a presentation made by an IRS Engineer Team Manager at the National IRS Symposium sponsored by the American Society of Appraisers (ASA). The presentation addressed the application of discounts to fractional interests, and asserted that certain levels of discounts amounted to a “minority premium” for certain non-controlling interests. The speaker presented a financial model that suggested certain caps on the discounts applicable to fractional interests. Much of the logic behind the model and the theory are valid in a world where one considers specific buyers. However, when applying Fair Market Value (FMV), the theory quickly disintegrates into an attempt to ignore the proper standard of value.</p> \n",
            "title": "Fractional Interest – “Minority Premium”?….Really?",
            "topicNames": [
               "Articles",
               "Valuation",
               "Hide Date"
            ]
         },
         {
            "absoluteUrl": "http://computan-2661279.hs-sites.com/test-blog/tax-law-evolution",
            "featuredImage": "",
            "featuredImageAltText": "",
            "featuredImageHeight": 0,
            "featuredImageWidth": 0,
            "id": 5633834443,
            "post_summary": "<p>The year started with a proverbial “BANG” from an estate planning perspective with the passage of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 late last year. The Act, as some have named TRUJCA, could almost just as easily been titled “Estate Tax Repeal.” Regardless of the name, the new rules certainly have people talking about the numerous planning opportunities it affords, although those may be temporary.</p> \n",
            "title": "Tax Law Evolution",
            "topicNames": [
               "Articles",
               "Valuation",
               "Hide Date"
            ]
         }
      ],
      "currentPageNumber": 14,
      "nextPageNumber": 15,
      "previousPageNumber": null,
      "totalPageCount": 28,
      "use_featured_image_in_summary": true
   },
   "experimentalHublData": null,
   "moduleName": "main-module-2",
   "supplementalFieldValues": {
      "defaultContent": {
         "nextPage": {},
         "previousPage": {}
      },
      "defaultRules": {
         "lockHeadingTextField": {}
      }
   }
}